Comparative detection of a large population of grapevine viruses by TaqMan® RT-qPCR and ELISA.

Grapevine (Vitis spp.) can be infected by numerous viruses that are often widespread and of great economic importance. Reliable detection methods are necessary for sanitary selection which is the only way to partly control grapevine virus diseases. Biological indexing and ELISA are currently the standard methods for screening propagation material, and PCR-methods are becoming increasingly popular. Due to the diversity of virus isolates, it is essential to verify that the tests allow the detection of the largest possible virus populations. We developed three quadruplex TaqMan® RT-qPCR assays for detecting nine different viruses that cause considerable damage in many vineyards world-wide. Each assay is designed to detect three viruses and the grapevine Actin as an internal control. A large population of grapevines from diverse cultivars and geographic location was tested for the presence of nine viruses: Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Grapevine fleck virus (GFkV), Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), Grapevine leafroll-associated viruses (GLRaV-1, -2, -3), Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), Grapevine virus A (GVA), and Grapevine virus B (GVB). In general, identical results were obtained with multiplex TaqMan® RT-qPCR and ELISA although, in some cases, viruses could be detected by only one of the two techniques.

Characterisation of the Vitis vinifera PR10 multigene family.

BACKGROUND: Genes belonging to the pathogenesis related 10 (PR10) group have been studied in several plant species, where they form multigene families. Until now, such an analysis has not been performed in Vitis vinifera, although three different PR10 genes were found to be expressed under pathogen attack or abiotic stress, and during somatic embryogenesis induction. We used the complete genome sequence for characterising the whole V. vinifera PR10 gene family. The expression of candidate genes was studied in various non-treated tissues and following somatic embryogenesis induction by the auxin 2,4-D. RESULTS: In addition to the three V. vinifera PR10 genes already described, namely VvPR10.1, VvPR10.2 and VvPR10.3, fourteen different PR10 related sequences were identified. Showing high similarity, they form a single cluster on the chromosome 5 comprising three pseudogenes. The expression of nine different genes was detected in various tissues. Although differentially expressed in non-treated plant organs, several genes were up-regulated in tissues treated with 2,4-D, as expected for PR genes. CONCLUSIONS: PR10 genes form a multigene family in V. vinifera, as found in birch, apple or peach. Seventeen closely related PR10 sequences are arranged in a tandem array on the chromosome 5, probably reflecting small-scale duplications during evolution. Various expression patterns were found for nine studied genes, highlighting functional diversification. A phylogenetic comparison of deduced proteins with PR10 proteins of other plants showed a characteristic low intraspecific variability. Particularly, a group of seven close tandem duplicates including VvPR10.1, VvPR10.2 and VvPR10.3 showed a very high similarity, suggesting concerted evolution or/and recent duplications.

Differential regulation of SERK, LEC1-like and pathogenesis-related genes during indirect secondary somatic embryogenesis in grapevine.

A culture model was developed in Vitis vinifera L., cultivar 'Chardonnay' for studying SE (Somatic Embryogenesis). The auxin 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) was used to induce indirect secondary embryogenesis at a high rate, starting from embryos derived from embryogenic cultures previously obtained. Cotyledonary embryos were shown to be more responsive to SE induction than embryos at the torpedo-stage and were used for molecular analyses. The expression of SERK (Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinase), L1L (Leafy Cotyledon1 Like) and a set of PR (Pathogenesis-Related) genes was monitored during the whole SE process. VvSERK1, VvSERK2 and VvL1L were down-regulated by the 2,4-D treatment but expressed in embryonic tissues. On the contrary, VvPR1, VvPR8, VvPR10.1 and VvPR10.3 were strongly up-regulated by the 2,4-D treatment, and their transcripts were not or only weakly detected in clusters of secondary embryos. VvSERK3, VvPR3 and VvPR10.2 were more stably expressed in all tissues examined. The discussion deals with the putative role of the different genes in grapevine SE.